USFlag
CalifFlag


Join the Linux Revolution!

BOYCOTT MICROSOFT CAMPAIGN

Gates

This is Tux: The official Linux mascot.

M$ Windows is great, right?

I don't THINK so.

So why would an otherwise intelligent guy insist on using an alternative operating system instead of the ever popular M$ Windoze?

I guess there are two main reasons for my insistance on making the switch.  The first reason has already been stated.  Windoze is not the savior of the computing world.  Or any other world for that matter.  I am somewhat of a Power User and often run 8 or 10 programs at a time.  It's a lot easier than opening and closing them all the time.  I have DSL, so I always have at least one web browser going at a time.  I keep my computer on all the time and have a much more secure feeling running Linux than running Windoze.   When I used to run Windows I all too often got the "Blue Screen of Death".   You know, "Fatal Execption Error" stuff.  My only question is "Why do you people put up with it???"

The second reason gets a lot more to the meat of it for me.  The Microsoft business model  (i.e. "I'm the biggest and meanest son of a bitch in the Valley, so Bow to Me!!!") is against every moral principle I have.  Microsoft was there between 1990 and 2001 when the incredible boom in personal computers took place.  In the early years they were the only player that the new computer users ever saw so they made unbelievable amounts of money on their monopoly of the Operating System market.  Then they began to realize something.  Computers last a long time and would only need one operating system.  So from the beginning they would "upgrade" Windoze and Microsoft Office every 2 years with more and more bells and whistles (that worked less and less well).  When Bill Gates premiered the Windoze 98 Edition it crashed in front of every major trade journalist in the world.  But by that time the company had a complete monopoly and didn't care if they were putting out a product worth the money or not.

They twisted the arm of the computer manufacturers and forced them to put the newest version on all their new systems by theatening to not supply them with fWindoze if they refused.  They also made their products "backwards compatible", which means a document written in Word  97 could be read by Word 2000.  Unfortunatly a document written in Word 2000 could not be read by Word 97.  The upshot of this for business is that if someone you do business with upgrades, you have to also. 
Another problem with this system is the ownership of the source code.  Source code is the words the programmer actually wrote when he/she wrote the program.  Here is a short example of a complete computer program in the C++ language;



###########################
int main()
{
int address=123;
     cout << "I live at " << address << " Main St.";
     return 0;
}
###########################

Even though it is a bit cryptic we can read what was written in the program.  The computer does not understand English or any other language of humans.  It only understands computer code.  After it is written, the souce code is put through a program called a compiler.  The compiler changes the written code into computer code so the computer can understand it.   Once complied this program will print "I live at 123 Main St." on the screen. 


So what has this got to do with Linux and Microsoft???  Everything!!!
Microsoft, and almost every other software company, uses propritary code.  That means they have copyrighted the program and they own it and you don't!  Ever read any of those "Ageements" you have to agree to before installing software?  They all say (and I paraphrase) "WE own the software, but we will license it to you, to use on one computer for the price you paid."  They own the source code, which you never see, and the complied program and can take legal action against you for putting it on more computers than you have a license for.   If there are any bugs, you get to wait until they get around to fixing them (and calling it another upgrade - that you get to pay for).
If you were a programmer and had access to the source code you could fix any bug the program might have.  You could even make it work differently (or better). You could change it to fit your individual needs.  And this happens every day on programs that are not propietary. This is where Linux comes in. 
Linux is open source.  Linux uses a different licensing scheme.  It is called the GNU General Public License copyleft .  It basically says there can be no charge for the software and the source code has to be available to the person receiving the program.  It is sometimes known as Free Software.  Why in the heck would  a programmer  get involved with that when they could go to work for a regular company that charges for the software and pays it's programmers with the profits.  The GNU project is a voluntary collaboration of thousands of programmers throughout the world who write code for free because the believe in the concept of Free Software.  They do it more for the recognition of their peers than anything else.   What they have been able to accomplish is amazing.        
I didn't say Open Source companies can't make money.  Even though they can't charge for the software they can charge for the distribution materials as well as support for the consumer (which we all know can be worth a lot).  It is a revolutionary idea that will revoluntionize the computer world. 


Of course this brings us to why not use Micrsoft Windows? How about:
You can run, but you can't hide
We are not an evil monoply
Trust us
Microsoft doesn't understand Open Source



To learn about it: Start here or here or even here



Check out these links too!


Gnome
KDE Desktop
quanta linux


Where I buy
newegg.com
My Operating System - No Windows here
Mandrake
I'm counted
lincounter


© 2002
Dick McCabe Jr


go to top